Jackson Kelly PLLC

Government Contracts Monitor

Evaluation and Award

Reasonable and Related to the Evaluation Criteria: Beyond Checking the Boxes in A&E Proposals

After an unsuccessful bid, disappointed bidders sometimes present hyper-technical protests in a passionate, yet misplaced, attempt to protect their economic interests. Many of these protests ignore the wide discretion GAO gives to agencies in their evaluation pf proposals, and ultimate selection of an awardee. Bidders on Architecture and Engineering (A&E) contracts must be particularly aware that…

Affiliation and Size: What Revenues Count in a Size Determination?

As most federal contractors are well aware, significant contracting opportunities are routinely set aside for small businesses, to the exclusion of large businesses. Confusion remains, however, concerning the concept of affiliation -- and how it can impact whether a given company is eligble for small business set-asides. The Small Business Administration (SBA) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA)…

Don’t Get Eliminated on a Technicality - But Don’t Play Games in an Attempt to Meet Solicitation Requirements

A recent decision by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) illustrates the importance of properly meeting a solicitation’s requirements in full, to include page limits and font sizes. While these may seem like insignificant details, failure to follow the instructions to the letter can mean the difference between a proposal being evaluated on its technical merits and being eliminated from…

Awardee’s Attempts to Recruit Incumbent’s Employees after Award Does Not Necessarily Mean It Engaged in a Bait and Switch Regarding Key Personnel

When incumbent contractors passed over for follow-on contracts seek to protest the award decision, they often challenge the evaluation of staffing and/or key personnel, arguing that the awardee’s proposal could not possibly be as strong as theirs because they proposed to use the current, experienced staff, something that the awardee was not able to do. If the incumbent learns after the award that…

Mind Your Q&As – Agency Answers May Resolve Ambiguities and Foreclose Potential Grounds for Protest

A recent article discussed the important difference between patent ambiguities obvious on the face of a solicitation and latent ambiguities that only come to light after contract award. A more recent decision of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) provides an important reminder that the Q&A process, which is meant in part to identify and resolve ambiguities in the solicitation, sometimes…

If a Solicitation Ambiguity Doesn’t Become Apparent until Evaluation of Proposals, It’s Latent – and Fair Game for a Post-Award Protest

One of the reasons it’s so important to read solicitations carefully is that such review can help you identify any ambiguities before submitting your proposal. If the ambiguity is obvious, or “patent”, you must protest it before the proposal due date or not at all. In other words, an offeror can’t wait to see who wins the contract before deciding to gripe about an ambiguity that may have hurt its…

Make Sure to Look at the Forest as Well as the Trees: Read Proposal Requirements in Context

When assessing opportunities and preparing proposals, reading and understanding the contents of the solicitation is imperative. If you don’t know what the solicitation requires, it can be very hard to prepare a responsive, much less winning, proposal. But focusing exclusively on the words themselves – separated from their proper context – can also lead offerors astray. This point was brought home…

Words Matter: Your Proposal Must Be Clear and Convincing

If you want to win contract awards, your proposal needs to clearly and persuasively explain why you are the right choice. The words you choose matter, as does the way you arrange them. Indeed, as the recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) decision in Federal Acquisition Services Alliant Joint Venture, B-411842.2 (November 9, 2015) starkly demonstrates, sloppy syntax, grammar, and…

If the Agency Gives You a Chance to Explain Your Proposed Costs, Take It

Agency comments during discussions often articulate a weakness or deficiency. Sometimes, however, the Government is also simply asking questions – identifying specific issues that should be addressed – and affording an offeror the opportunity to explain its proposal. When that happens, contractors need to be ready to capitalize on that opportunity to explain, but not always necessarily to change,…

Proposal Preparation: Make Clear Your Proposed Personnel Are Available

Two recent decisions by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) highlight the importance of making clear, in your proposal, that your proposed staff and key personnel are locked-in and will be available and ready to go at the start of the proposed effort. This is particularly so where the solicitation requires express availability commitment letters.  In each of these cases the offeror…

What You Say in Your Proposal Can and Will Be Used Against You

Preparing a contract proposal can be like writing a story.  But while a story involves plot and character development, a proposal instead focuses on how best to explain why the offeror and its product/services are the best response to the agency’s stated needs. In order to be successful, the explanation must include only information that supports the message being conveyed.…

There’s More to Winning an Unbalanced Pricing Protest than Meets the Eye

It’s relatively easy for disappointed offerors to latch onto perceived unbalanced pricing as the basis to protest an award. As soon as they see pricing they consider out of balance, they are off to the races. It can be much harder, however, to win such a protest, even where unbalanced pricing has been demonstrated and the agency has failed to consider the risks posed by such pricing as required…

 

© 2024 Jackson Kelly PLLC. All Rights Reserved.